Improving Silicosis Outcomes in the UK
Andy Potter • September 7, 2023

Silicosis, a serious occupational lung disease caused by inhaling crystalline silica dust, continues to pose a significant health risk for workers in various industries. Despite awareness of its dangers, efforts to mitigate exposure and improve outcomes have encountered challenges. This article delves into the complexities of silicosis, examines current approaches, and explores potential strategies for enhancing prevention and treatment.


Raising Awareness and Addressing Risk


The evidence indicates that raising awareness about the risks of silica exposure is crucial. The use of real-time monitoring technology emerges as a promising solution, offering immediate feedback and actionable alerts. DustCanary, a leading provider of personal safety monitoring systems, asserts that real-time monitoring, when integrated with clear controls and procedures, can drive a change in safety standards. This technology acts as an instant incentive for workers to respond promptly to silica hazards, akin to how they react to fire alarms or gas detection systems.This technology acts as an instant incentive for workers to respond promptly to silica hazards, akin to how they react to fire alarms or gas detection systems.


Moreover, real-time monitoring has made significant strides in recent years. Advanced tools, such as Open Path – Optical Refraction Technology (OP-ORT) instruments, offer continuous detection of silica levels, enabling rapid intervention. The Mineral Products Association (MPA) acknowledges the role of innovative measurement technology in identifying dust emission sources and abnormal exposure situations. The potential for real-time monitoring devices to complement traditional exposure assessment methods is recognised, raising the need for updated guidance from the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) on their utilisation.


A Call for Regulatory Adaptation


The Control of Substances Hazardous to Health (COSHH) Regulations outline guidelines for controlling exposure to hazardous substances, including silica. The regulatory framework mandates risk assessment, exposure prevention, provision of protective equipment, and health surveillance. However, real-time monitoring introduces a dynamic element that demands regulatory adaptation. The HSE's commitment to advancing the measurement of occupational exposure to silica is essential, and HSE's ongoing research should inform potential updates to guidelines.


Positioning Real-Time Monitoring Within the Hierarchy of Controls


As industries strive to reduce silica exposure, the hierarchy of controls remains a fundamental framework. Real-time monitoring could be a valuable addition to this hierarchy, verifying the effectiveness of engineering and administrative controls. DustCanary, a proponent of real-time monitoring, suggests that these devices could function as part of the control strategy by providing continuous feedback on control measures' efficacy.


A Collaborative Approach for Progress


Industry stakeholders, including the Environment Agency and DEFRA, have already recognised the potential of real-time monitoring in addressing air quality concerns. The introduction of standards and certification schemes underscores the significance of data quality. In line with these efforts, the HSE should consider the integration of real-time monitoring technologies, ensuring robust validation and substantiated claims.


Conclusion


Improving silicosis outcomes requires a range of efforts, from awareness campaigns to regulatory enhancements. Real-time monitoring technology emerges as a transformative tool that offers immediate intervention opportunities and enhances the accuracy of exposure assessment. Collaborative initiatives involving industry, regulators, and research institutions are essential to driving progress in reducing silica exposure and enhancing worker safety. As real-time monitoring evolves, it has the potential to redefine the landscape of workplace health and safety, offering a proactive approach to safeguarding the well-being of those at risk of silicosis.

Contact Us

By Ultra Protect • September 22, 2026
Discover what a dust extraction system is, how it works, and whether fixed or mobile extraction suits your business. A practical guide from Ultra Protect.
Close-up of gray gravel stones filling the frame
By Andy Potter • September 7, 2026
If you're responsible for health and safety in your workplace, you've probably encountered the terms "workplace exposure level," "TWA," and "STEL." But what do they actually mean, and why do they matter for dust management? The simple answer: these are legal limits set by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) to protect workers from harmful dust exposure. If you're not monitoring them, you're flying blind and potentially breaking the law. What is Workplace Exposure Level? A workplace exposure level (WEL) is the maximum amount of a harmful substance that a worker can be exposed to during their working day without suffering adverse health effects. For dust, it's measured in milligrams per cubic metre of air (mg/m³). The HSE sets these limits based on scientific evidence about how different dust types affect human health. Different dusts have different exposure limits because they pose different risks. For example, the WEL for respirable crystalline silica is far stricter than for general inert dust, because silica is significantly more harmful to the lungs. Think of it this way: the WEL is your compliance baseline. However, being below a WEL does not by itself discharge the COSHH duty. Download the HSE's guidance on workplace exposure limits If you want to understand the levels in your workplace contact us about our silica air sampling services TWA: The 8-Hour Average TWA stands for Time-Weighted Average, and it's the most commonly referenced exposure limit. The TWA measures the average concentration of a substance over a standard 8-hour working day. Here's why that matters: dust exposure isn't constant. Workers might face high concentrations during certain activities (cutting, grinding, demolition) and lower concentrations during others. The TWA accounts for these fluctuations by averaging them out over the full shift. This recognises that workers can tolerate brief periods of higher exposure, provided the average stays within acceptable limits. For example, the current WEL for respirable crystalline silica is 0.1 mg/m³ as an 8-hour TWA. This means that if a construction worker is grinding stone for part of their shift but doing lower-dust tasks for the rest, the daily average should not exceed this level. The advantage of TWA is that it's practical for real-world work. Few jobs maintain constant dust levels. The disadvantage is that it can mask dangerous peaks, if a worker is exposed to very high concentrations for a short period, the TWA might still look acceptable. STEL: The Short-Term Exposure Limit STEL stands for Short-Term Exposure Limit, and it's your safety net for peak exposures. A STEL is the maximum concentration a worker should experience during any 15-minute period in a working day, and no more than four such periods should occur, with at least 60 minutes between them. The STEL exists precisely because the TWA can obscure dangerous peaks. Imagine a worker exposed to very high silica dust for 15 minutes whilst cutting stone, then lower levels for the rest of the day. The TWA might be within limits, but those 15 minutes could still cause significant lung damage. There should be a maximum of 4 STEL's in a single working day and there must be at least 60-minutes between each STEL period. Not all dusts have a STEL, but those that do (like respirable crystalline silica) reflect a recognition that short, intense exposures carry genuine health risks that the 8-hour average doesn't capture. Reducing personal exposure to inhalable dust with Cleanspace Respirators